Home » Case law » Inherent jurisdiction and vulnerable adults: Redcar and Cleveland BC v PR [2019] EWHC 2305 (Fam) and Wakefield MDC v DN [2019] EWHC 2306 (Fam)

Inherent jurisdiction and vulnerable adults: Redcar and Cleveland BC v PR [2019] EWHC 2305 (Fam) and Wakefield MDC v DN [2019] EWHC 2306 (Fam)

Publication Date: 13 September 2019

Photo: Chris Titze/AdobeStock

Introduction

By Tim Spencer-Lane Introduction The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court, sometimes referred to as the “great safety net”, exists to fill gaps left by the law. Historically, in relation to adults, the courts had developed this jurisdiction primarily to protect those lacking decision-making capacity. As a result of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), […]

You need to log in to Community Care Inform to view this content. If you have a subscription, please log in here.

Please contact the Community Care Inform helpdesk or phone 020 3915 9444 if you require support or assistance or are unsure if you have a subscription.

If you don’t currently have access, click here to find out more about subscribing to Community Care Inform.

Add item to CPD log

Title *
Inherent jurisdiction and vulnerable adults: Redcar and Cleveland BC v PR [2019] EWHC 2305 (Fam) and Wakefield MDC v DN [2019] EWHC 2306 (Fam)

Date *
02-03-2021 (dd-mm-yyyy)

Learning or development activity, resource or URL
https://adults.ccinform.co.uk/case-law/inherent-jurisdiction-and-vulnerable-adults-redcar-and-cleveland-bc-v-pr-2019-ewhc-2305-fam-and-wakefield-mdc-v-dn-2019-ewhc-2306-fam/

Learning

Use the boxes below to record what you have learned from this activity. The form below replicates that used by Social Work England on your online account, so that when you have to renew your registration you can include this as evidence of your continuing professional development. Everything you write will be stored in your Inform account from which you can copy the information into your Social Work England account, export all the information as a Word file or print it off.

1. What was your job role? Briefly provide the context of your role when you did the CPD?

2. What did you do? Provide more information to explain the title of the CPD, for example, what you did and/or what happened.

3. Critical reflection - explain the impact that the CPD had on the quality of your practice.

4. Social Work England have eight CPD standards (4.1-4.8). Which of these do you believe your learning demonstrates? Note down and reflect on as many as apply. The eight standards are:

4.1 Incorporate feedback from a range of sources, including from people with lived experience of my social work practice.
4.2 Use supervision and feedback to critically reflect on, and identify my learning needs, including how I use research and evidence to inform my practice.
4.3 Keep my practice up to date and record how I use research, theories and frameworks to inform my practice and my professional judgement.
4.4 Demonstrate good subject knowledge on key aspects of social work practice and develop knowledge of current issues in society and social policies impacting on social work.
4.5 Contribute to an open and creative learning culture in the workplace to discuss, reflect on and share best practice.
4.6 Reflect on my learning activities and evidence what impact continuing professional development has on the quality of my practice.
4.7 Record my learning and reflection on a regular basis and in accordance with Social Work England's guidance on continuing professional development.
4.8 Reflect on my own values and challenge the impact they have on my practice.

For more information, see Social Work England’s guidance on CPD.

Add item to PRTL log

Title * Inherent jurisdiction and vulnerable adults: Redcar and Cleveland BC v PR [2019] EWHC 2305 (Fam) and Wakefield MDC v DN [2019] EWHC 2306 (Fam)

Date * 02-03-2021 (dd-mm-yyyy)

URL https://adults.ccinform.co.uk/case-law/inherent-jurisdiction-and-vulnerable-adults-redcar-and-cleveland-bc-v-pr-2019-ewhc-2305-fam-and-wakefield-mdc-v-dn-2019-ewhc-2306-fam/

Learning Use the boxes below to record what you have learned from this activity. Everything you write will be stored in your Inform account and you can export all the information as a Word file or print it off. When you have to renew your social work registration with Social Care Wales, you can include this as evidence of post-registration training and learning.

1. What have you learned from this activity?

2. How has it contributed to your practice?

3. How much time have you spent on this activity?

4. Next steps (any additional learning you need in this area)?

For more details, visit Social Care Wales

Citation

Full Harvard reference for this document:

Spencer-Lane, T (2019) Inherent jurisdiction and vulnerable adults: Redcar and Cleveland BC v PR [2019] EWHC 2305 (Fam) and Wakefield MDC v DN [2019] EWHC 2306 (Fam). Case Law.
Community Care Inform
[online]
https://adults.ccinform.co.uk/case-law/inherent-jurisdiction-and-vulnerable-adults-redcar-and-cleveland-bc-v-pr-2019-ewhc-2305-fam-and-wakefield-mdc-v-dn-2019-ewhc-2306-fam/
[accessed: 2 March 2021]

If you are directly quoting the author's own words from this document you must acknowledge that they are not your own words by putting them within quotes marks, reference the source in the text and then provide the full reference at the end of the document. For example:

In the text: Baim argues that "understanding adult attachment patterns can also help practitioners to more readily identify the behaviour patterns that the client uses to maintain safety and comfort and which also, in some cases, serve to keep the client stuck in behaviour that no longer serves them as adults". (Baim, 2015)

Full reference to insert at the bottom of the document: Baim, C. (2015) Using attachment theory to work with adults, Guide. Community Care Inform Adults [online]. Available at: https://adults.ccinform.co.uk/guides/guide-using-attachment-theory-work-adults/ [accessed: INSERT DATE HERE (eg 9 October 2015)]